The Client Risk and The Audit Planning: Influence of Acceptance of Audit Engagement

Deby Suryani, Tigor Sitorus

Abstract


This study briefly aims to extend the relationship between client risks with the audit planning  by proposes the acceptance of audit engagement as mediate variable  to fill a gap research, furthermore to determine the effect of client risk toward the audit planning in Public Accounting Firm in Jakarta, Indonesia. This research is a quantitative causal with primary data obtained by questionnaires. The population of this study are the auditors of Public Accounting Firm registered in the Directory Indonesian Institute of Accountants (Certified) 2016 in Jakarta and to obtain the sample used purposive sampling technique and obtained samples of 197 respondents from 45 Public Accounting Firms spread in Jakarta. The analyze of data is using Structural Equation Modeling. The results of this research shows; (1). The Client risks directly may affect on the audit planning in a positive but not significantly, (2). The Client risk directly affect the acceptance of audit positively and significantly, (3). The acceptance of audit engagement has positively and significantly influence on audit planning. Therefore the acceptance of audit engagement perfectly can act as mediate variable between client's risks with the audit planning, where as the acceptance of audit engagement indicated by Time Budget Pressure, Audit Fee. Letter of Auditing and all indicator have a high loading factors.

Key Words: Risk, Client, Acceptance, Plan, Audit.

  https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.10.3.183-198


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agoes, Sukrisno. (2016). Auditing Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan oleh Kantor Auntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Arens, Alvin A., Elder, Randal J., & Beasley, Mark S. (2015). Auditing dan Jasa Assurance. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Bedard, Jean C., & Johnstone, Karla M. (2004). Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors’ Planning and Pricing Decision. The Accounting Review. Vol 79. No 2. Pp 277-304. in www.researchgate.net

Comiskey, E.E., & Mulford, C.W. (2010). Deteksi Kecurangan Akuntansi. Jakarta: PPM.

Elder, Randal J., Beasley, Mark S., Arens, Alvin A., & Jusuf, Amir Abadi. (2013). Jasa Audit dan Assurance: Pendekatan Terpadu (Adaptasi Indonesia). Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ferdinand, A. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro.

Gammal, Walid el. (2012). Determinants of Audit Fees: Evidence From Lebanon. International Business Research. Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon. Vol 5. No 11. Pp 136-145. in citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

Guy, Dan M., Alderman, Wayne., & Winters, Alan J. (2002). Auditing. Edisi 5. Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hassn, Nasr Taha. (2014). The Impact of Earnings Management Risk and Corporate Governance Risk on Auditors’ Decisions. Perceptions of Egyptian Auditors. Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting & Auditing. Benha University, Egypt. Vol 1. No 1. Pp 7-27. in http://journals.uob.edu.bh

Hastuti, Theresia Dwi., & Indarto, Stefani Lily. (2014). Decision of Acceptance or Rejection of Assignment Auditing: A test of the Effect of Client’s Business Risk, Risk Audit, Risk Business Auditor and Adaptation to Risk. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law. Soegijapranata Catholic University. Vol 5 issue 1 (Dec), pp.20-29. in seajbel.com

Hat, Ventje., & Korompis, Awdrey CH. (2011). Pengaruh Risiko Manipulasi Earnings dan Risiko Corporate Governance Terhadap Lamanya Perencanaan Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Going Concern. Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Vol 22. No 2. pp 1-15. dalam repo.unsrat.ac.id

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2015). Direktori Kantor Akuntan Publik Jakarta 2015. Diunduh pada 4 Oktober 2016. Dalam iapi.or.id/direktori

Kikhia, Hassan Yahia. (2015). Determinants of Audit Fees : Evidence From Jordan. Accounting and Finance Research. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China. Vol 4. No 1. Pp 42-53. in www.sciedu.ca/afr

Kimeli, Elkana Kiptum. (2016). Determinants of Audit Fees Pricing: Evidence From Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE). International Journal of Reaserch in Business Studies and Management. Maasai Mara University, Narok, Kenya. Vol 3. Issues 1. Pp 23-35. in www.ijrbsm.org

Mulyadi. (2013). Auditing. Edisi 6. Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Mustafa, EQ, Z., & Wijaya, T. (2012). Panduan Teknik Statistik SEM & PLS dengan SPSS AMOS. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Ouertani, insaf., & Ayadi, Salma Damak. (2012). Auditor Engagement Decision : An Exploratory Studi In The Tunisian Context. Journal of Accounting and Management Information System. IHEC Carthage, Tunisia. Vol 11. No 3. Pp 371-390. in ftp://ftp.repec.org

Pardede, Ratlan., & Manurung, Reinhard. (2014). Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis) Teori dan Aplikasi Dalam Riset Bisnis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Pardede, Ratlan., & Manurung, Reinhard. (2015). Prosedur dan Aplikasi Program AMOS dalam Penelitian Model Persamaan Struktural. Jakarta: Harfamedia.

Pratistha, K. Dwiyani., & Widhiyani, Ni Luh Sari. (2014). Pengaruh Independensi Auditor dan Besaran Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Proses Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol 6. No 3. Pp 419-428. Dalam ojs.unud.ac.id

Priyatno, Duwi. (2014). SPSS 22: Pengolahan Data Terpraktis. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan Kementrian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2014). Profil Akuntan Publik & Kantor Akuntan Publik. Diunduh pada 17 September 2016. Dalam pppk.kemenkeu.go.id

Reding, Kurt F., Sobel, Paul J., Anderson, Urton L., Head, Michael J., Ramamoorti, Sridhar., Salamasick, Mark., & Riddle, Cris. (2009). Internal Auditing: Assurance & Consulting Services. Second Edition. Florida: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation (IIARF).

Riahi, Ahmed., & Belkaoui. (2011). Teori Akuntansi. Edisi 5. Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sarjono, Haryadi., & Winda, Julianita. (2011). SPSS VS LISREL: Sebuah Pengantar Aplikasi Untuk Riset. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sensi, Ludovicus. (2006). Evaluasi Manajemen Resiko Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Dalam Keputusan Penerimaan Klien Berdasarkan Pertimbangan dari Risiko Klien, Risiko Audit dan Risiko Bisnis Auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonensia. Universitas Indonesia. Vol 3. No 2. pp191-211. Dalam jaki.ui.ac.id

Sugiyono. (2015). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Widagdo, Bambang., & Widayat. (2011). Permodelan Persamaan Structural. Malang: Penerbitan Universitas Muhammadiyah.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




International Research Journal of Business Studies indexed in: